Car Parking Questionnaire Result
|
Questions
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
| 1. Do you consider that MVDC should continue to provide long stay parking in the Village? |
2177
|
59
|
16
|
|
97%
|
3%
|
1%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 2. Do you consider that the APMH car park should continue to meet the needs of APMH users, other shoppers, business users and visitors? |
2225
|
10
|
17
|
|
99%
|
0%
|
1%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 3. Do you consider that long stay parking needs should continue to be provided in the APMH car park? |
2055
|
155
|
42
|
|
91%
|
7%
|
2%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 4. Do you consider that Grove Road car park should continue to be available for short term parking? |
2163
|
45
|
44
|
|
96%
|
2%
|
2%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 5. Do you consider that an increase in on-road parking to meet displaced long stay needs would be unacceptable? |
2092
|
142
|
18
|
|
93%
|
6%
|
1%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 6. If Mole Valley District Council is unable to relocate 74 long term car parking spaces locally should it buy or lease land for this purpose? |
398
|
1761
|
93
|
|
18%
|
78%
|
4%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 7. If Mole Valley District Council is unable to relocate 74 long term car parking spaces locally should it encourage Tesco or another landowner to provide the space? |
254
|
947
|
51
|
|
20%
|
76%
|
4%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 8. Would you support the relocation of long stay parking provision outside Ashtead? |
219
|
1994
|
39
|
|
10%
|
89%
|
2%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 9. In principle, do you consider that a proposal for a smaller store on the site could be acceptable? |
1502
|
690
|
60
|
|
67%
|
31%
|
3%
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
No Reply
|
|
| 10. Do you consider that any new proposal should be restricted to a convenience store i.e. one intended primarily to meet “top-up” needs, not for weekly shopping? |
1762
|
435
|
55
|
|
78%
|
19%
|
2%
|
{ 0 comments… add one now }