Car Parking Questionnaire Result
Questions | Yes | No | No Reply |
| 1. Do you consider that MVDC should continue to provide long stay parking in the Village? | 2177 | 59 | 16 |
97% | 3% | 1% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 2. Do you consider that the APMH car park should continue to meet the needs of APMH users, other shoppers, business users and visitors? | 2225 | 10 | 17 |
99% | 0% | 1% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 3. Do you consider that long stay parking needs should continue to be provided in the APMH car park? | 2055 | 155 | 42 |
91% | 7% | 2% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 4. Do you consider that Grove Road car park should continue to be available for short term parking? | 2163 | 45 | 44 |
96% | 2% | 2% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 5. Do you consider that an increase in on-road parking to meet displaced long stay needs would be unacceptable? | 2092 | 142 | 18 |
93% | 6% | 1% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 6. If Mole Valley District Council is unable to relocate 74 long term car parking spaces locally should it buy or lease land for this purpose? | 398 | 1761 | 93 |
18% | 78% | 4% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 7. If Mole Valley District Council is unable to relocate 74 long term car parking spaces locally should it encourage Tesco or another landowner to provide the space? | 254 | 947 | 51 |
20% | 76% | 4% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 8. Would you support the relocation of long stay parking provision outside Ashtead? | 219 | 1994 | 39 |
10% | 89% | 2% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 9. In principle, do you consider that a proposal for a smaller store on the site could be acceptable? | 1502 | 690 | 60 |
67% | 31% | 3% | |
Yes | No | No Reply | |
| 10. Do you consider that any new proposal should be restricted to a convenience store i.e. one intended primarily to meet “top-up” needs, not for weekly shopping? | 1762 | 435 | 55 |
78% | 19% | 2% |